H1Zeus - HERA Combined Results

HEAVY FLAVOURS AND PROTON STRUCTURE

QCD Analysis of Combined Measurement of charm structure function at HERA (Preliminary)

(1) F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, standard RTVFNS fig01
F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, standard RTVFNS
(2) F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, optimized RTVFNS fig02
F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, optimized RTVFNS
(3) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, standard RTVFNS, Q2=2 GeV2 fig03
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, standard RTVFNS, Q2=2 GeV2
(4) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, optimized RTVFNS, Q2=2 GeV2 fig04
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, optimized RTVFNS, Q2=2 GeV2
(5) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, standard RTVFNS, Q2=10 GeV2 fig05
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, standard RTVFNS, Q2=10 GeV2
(6) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, optimized RTVFNS, Q2=10 GeV2 fig06
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, optimized RTVFNS, Q2=10 GeV2
(7) F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, ACOT full fig07
F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, ACOT full
(8) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=2 GeV2, ACOT full, HERAPDF1.0 in ACOT scheme is also shown. fig08
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=2 GeV2, ACOT full, HERAPDF1.0 in ACOT scheme is also shown.
(9) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=10 GeV2, ACOT full, HERAPDF1.0 in ACOT scheme is also shown. fig09
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=10 GeV2, ACOT full, HERAPDF1.0 in ACOT scheme is also shown.
(10) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV and mc=1.65 GeV, Q2=2 GeV2, ACOT full fig10
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV and mc=1.65 GeV, Q2=2 GeV2, ACOT full
(11) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV and mc=1.65 GeV, Q2=10 GeV2, ACOT full fig11
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV and mc=1.65 GeV, Q2=10 GeV2, ACOT full
(12) F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, FFNS fig12
F2cc compared to NLO QCD using HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, FFNS
(13) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=2 GeV2, FFNS, HERAPDF1.0 in FFNS scheme is also shown. fig13
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=2 GeV2, FFNS, HERAPDF1.0 in FFNS scheme is also shown.
(14) NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=10 GeV2, FFNS, HERAPDF1.0 in FFNS scheme is also shown. fig14
NLO PDF fit including HERA F2cc data, mc=1.4 GeV, Q2=10 GeV2, FFNS, HERAPDF1.0 in FFNS scheme is also shown.
(15) F2cc compared to NNLO HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, alfa_s=0.1145 fig15
F2cc compared to NNLO HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, alfa_s=0.1145
(16) F2cc compared to NNLO HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, alfa_s=0.1176 fig16
F2cc compared to NNLO HERA PDF using charm data for mc=1.4 and mc=1.65 GeV, alfa_s=0.1176