Minutes of the Phone-Meeting, September 26, 18h00 (CET) ======================================================== The meeting start with the presentation of the participants. KEK/Babar absence is noted and Cristi apologises for choosing a non favourable time for Japan. He will mention the points raised by email by Prof. Sasaki (KEK). The experiments presented shortly the data analysis models and also some considerations concerning long term data persistency. The experiments (CDF, D0, H1, ZEUS, Babar) have similar time scales (+/- 1 year), the horizon for continuing data analysis after the end of the data taking is about 5 years. The medium term strategy is to conserve the present analysis model. Some experiments plan to enhance the abstraction (ZEUS). Some considerations were made about the strategies to conserve data. There here are two complementary aspects of this subject (Amber): first is the prolongation of the present analysis power within the collaboration, second is the perenity and accessibility of the data at longer term. We should adress both of them in our discussion. The longer term perspective is not yet systematically adressed by the experiments, although Gregory presented some concrete working fronts considered within Babar computing. Richard Mount underlined the importance of such project in order to maintain the interest for HEP computing in the host laboratories of closed experiments. -The objectives of the workshop were adopted. The intial list was considered a good starting point: - Review and document the physics objectives of the data persistency in HEP - Exchange information concerning the analysis model: abstraction, software, documentation etc. and identify coherence points - Address the harware and software persistency status - Get some external (non-HEP, non-research etc.) input - Converge to a common set of specifications in a document that will constitute the basis for future collaborations. The document can also serve as a basis for specific request to our funding agencies. - Review possible fundings programs (national/european/international) It was clarified that we should agree on common standards, but not try to evolve the analysis models towards an unique structure or to attempt common analyses etc. The relationship with LHC computing was discussed: it is agreed that representatives will be invited, since the LHC computing will be the dominant HEP computing project in the next two decades. LEP representatives should be also be invited. A review of "long user models" should be made (reasons for re-analysis, external usage of the data for training//outreach etc). We should adress the point of view of re-use of the data with little(no) insider knowledge. We should also consider the aspects of the intellectual property and open access to experimental data. The proposal to organise the workshop is the following. We foresee two steps: - A first workshop to asses the principles and create the momentum for concrete studies. The first workshop should create some directions of investigations, to be followed in smaller working groups. - A second workshop will be organised in order to review this work and to converge on a common document as a basis for further reference and future developments and collaborations. The proposal is to organise the first workshop in DESY. The date will be agreed by e-mail (vote). It is agreed that the principle is that we need to meet and discuss _in person_ as much as possible, so this should be taken into account in the vote. (video will be provided though). SLAC is candidate for the second workshop. It is agreed that a reasonable visibility should be given to this initiative, as sson as the organisation of the first workshop is mature enough. Francois Le Diberder makes the point about ICFA seminar, to be held at SLAC October 28-31. The objective is to make this workshop known to ICFA. There is a good chance to have most of the organisational matters settled before this date, which may justify a short presentation in one of the discussion sessions of the ICFA seminar.